GPT-6 Sol (High) vs Mercury 2
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (High) by OpenAI or Mercury 2 by Inception? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (High) scores 31.6 points higher (42.4 vs 10.8) but costs 5.8× as much to run the benchmark ($605 vs $105; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (High) when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Mercury 2 when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (High) | Mercury 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.4 | 10.8 | −74.5% Mercury 2 is 74.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $604.52 | $104.94 | −82.6% Mercury 2 is 82.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.77s | 6.65s | −55.0% Mercury 2 is 55.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $0.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Mercury 2 vs GPT-6 Sol (High): 74.5% less intelligence, 82.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Mercury 2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
GPT-6 Sol (High)Mercury 2Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-high/mercury-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-high/mercury-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill