GPT-6 Sol (High) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (High) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 2.7 points higher (45.1 vs 42.4) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $605; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Sol (High).
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (High) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.4 | 45.1 | +6.4% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 6.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $604.52 | $1,655.27 | +173.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 2.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.24s | 28.35s | +33.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 33.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Sol (High): 6.4% more intelligence, 173.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Sol (High)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-high/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-high/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill