GPT-6 Sol (High) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Sol (High)
Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-6 Sol (High): 30.4% less intelligence, 276.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 6.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (High) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.4 | 29.5 | −30.4% Qwen3.7 Max is 30.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $604.52 | $2,277.12 | +276.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 3.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.56s | 16.62s | +6.8% Qwen3.7 Max is 6.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-6 Sol (High)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-high/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-high/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill