GPT-6 Sol (High) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (High) scores 17.2 points higher (42.4 vs 25.2) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($605 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Sol (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (High) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.4 | 25.2 | −40.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 40.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $604.52 | $427.73 | −29.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 29.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.77s | 46.21s | +212.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 212.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Sol (High): 40.6% less intelligence, 29.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 212.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6 Sol (High)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-high/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-high/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill