GPT-6 Sol (Low) vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash scores 6.9 points higher (41.1 vs 34.2) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1015 vs $269; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Ling 3.1 Flash when you need intelligence above 34.2, and GPT-6 Sol (Low) when 34.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Low) | Ling 3.1 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.2 | 41.1 | +20.2% Ling 3.1 Flash is 20.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $268.73 | $1,014.56 | +277.5% Ling 3.1 Flash is 3.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.18s | 13.61s | +120.2% Ling 3.1 Flash is 120.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol (Low): 20.2% more intelligence, 277.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 120.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Ling 3.1 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-6 Sol (Low)Ling 3.1 FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-low/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-low/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill