GPT-6 Sol (Low) vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Low) scores 24.9 points higher (34.2 vs 9.3) but costs 5.8× as much to run the benchmark ($269 vs $46.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Low) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Low) | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.2 | 9.3 | −72.8% Mistral Large 3 is 72.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $268.73 | $46.41 | −82.7% Mistral Large 3 is 82.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.10s | 7.23s | +18.5% Mistral Large 3 is 18.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 3 vs GPT-6 Sol (Low): 72.8% less intelligence, 82.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 18.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6 Sol (Low)Mistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-low/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-low/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill