GPT-6 Sol (Low) vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Low) scores 21.3 points higher (34.2 vs 12.9) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($269 vs $92.8; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6 Sol (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Lightning.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Low) | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.2 | 12.9 | −62.3% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 62.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $268.73 | $92.76 | −65.5% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 65.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.34s | 9.16s | +44.5% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 44.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.06 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 Sol (Low): 62.3% less intelligence, 65.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
GPT-6 Sol (Low)Nemotron 3.5 LightningToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-low/nemotron-3-5-lightning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-low/nemotron-3-5-lightning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill