GPT-6 Sol (Medium) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Medium) scores 30.5 points higher (39.8 vs 9.3) but costs 9.5× as much to run the benchmark ($416 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Medium) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Medium) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 9.3 | −76.6% Llama 4 Maverick is 76.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $416.32 | $43.98 | −89.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 89.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 10.82s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Sol (Medium): 76.6% less intelligence, 89.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6 Sol (Medium)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-medium/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-medium/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill