GPT-6 Sol (Medium) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Medium) scores 1.9 points higher (39.8 vs 37.9) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($416 vs $110; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Medium) when you need intelligence above 37.9, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash when 37.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Medium) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 37.9 | −4.8% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $416.32 | $109.55 | −73.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 73.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 49.53s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol (Medium): 4.8% less intelligence, 73.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Sol (Medium)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-medium/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-medium/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill