GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 13.7 points higher (42.2 vs 28.5) but costs 3.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $449; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 28.5, and GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when 28.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 42.2 | +48.1% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 48.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $1,630.69 | +262.9% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 3.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.01s | 11.28s | +87.7% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 87.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 48.1% more intelligence, 262.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill