GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) scores 6.7 points higher (28.5 vs 21.8) but costs 7.3× as much to run the benchmark ($449 vs $61.9; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 21.8 | −23.5% MiMo-V2.5 is 23.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $61.93 | −86.2% MiMo-V2.5 is 86.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.83s | 46.61s | +699.5% MiMo-V2.5 is 699.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 23.5% less intelligence, 86.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 699.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill