GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) scores 23.7 points higher (28.5 vs 4.8) but costs 37× as much to run the benchmark ($449 vs $12.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 4.8 | −83.2% Ministral 3 3B is 83.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $12.23 | −97.3% Ministral 3 3B is 97.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.41s | 3.06s | −43.4% Ministral 3 3B is 43.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 83.2% less intelligence, 97.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 43.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Ministral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill