GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) scores 19.2 points higher (28.5 vs 9.3) but costs 9.7× as much to run the benchmark ($449 vs $46.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 9.3 | −67.4% Mistral Large 3 is 67.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $46.41 | −89.7% Mistral Large 3 is 89.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.83s | 7.23s | +24.0% Mistral Large 3 is 24.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 3 vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 67.4% less intelligence, 89.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Mistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill