GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.1
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) scores 21.4 points higher (28.5 vs 7.1) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($449 vs $27.8; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 7.1, and Mistral Small 3.1 when 7.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Small 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 7.1 | −75.1% Mistral Small 3.1 is 75.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $27.82 | −93.8% Mistral Small 3.1 is 93.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.75s | 11.75s | +104.3% Mistral Small 3.1 is 104.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.08 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.1 vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 75.1% less intelligence, 93.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 104.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Mistral Small 3.1Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill