GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 11.1 points higher (39.6 vs 28.5) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $449; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 28.5, and GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when 28.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 39.6 | +38.9% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 38.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $1,385.40 | +208.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 3.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.91s | 20.60s | +248.6% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 248.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 38.9% more intelligence, 208.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 248.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill