GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 55.1% less intelligence, 193.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 212.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 12.8 | −55.1% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 55.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $1,318.62 | +193.4% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 2.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.33s | 16.68s | +212.9% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 212.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill