GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) scores 17.7 points higher (28.5 vs 10.8) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($449 vs $233; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 10.8 | −62.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 62.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $232.95 | −48.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 48.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.01s | 8.30s | +38.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 38.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 62.1% less intelligence, 48.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 38.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill