GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) scores 38.2 points higher (44.2 vs 6.0) but costs 23× as much to run the benchmark ($855 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.2 | 6.0 | −86.4% Ministral 3 14B is 86.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $854.60 | $37.56 | −95.6% Ministral 3 14B is 95.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.79s | 7.92s | −83.8% Ministral 3 14B is 83.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh): 86.4% less intelligence, 95.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 83.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-xhigh/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-xhigh/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill