GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 8.2 points higher (52.4 vs 44.2) but costs 6.8× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $855; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 44.2, and GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) when 44.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.2 | 52.4 | +18.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 18.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $854.60 | $5,786.78 | +577.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 6.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 42.43s | 43.73s | +3.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh): 18.6% more intelligence, 577.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-xhigh/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-xhigh/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill