GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores 1.2 points higher (45.4 vs 44.2) but costs 5.8× as much to run the benchmark ($4935 vs $855; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when you need intelligence above 44.2, and GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) when 44.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.2 | 45.4 | +2.7% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 2.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $854.60 | $4,934.79 | +477.4% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 5.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 42.26s | 62.92s | +48.9% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 48.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh): 2.7% more intelligence, 477.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-xhigh/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-xhigh/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill