GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) scores 33.4 points higher (44.2 vs 10.8) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($855 vs $233; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.2 | 10.8 | −75.6% Trinity Large Thinking is 75.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $854.60 | $232.95 | −72.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 72.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 38.67s | 8.25s | −78.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 78.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh): 75.6% less intelligence, 72.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-xhigh/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-xhigh/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill