GPT-6 Sol (Max) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Max) scores 20.0 points higher (47.6 vs 27.6) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1536 vs $1165; both premium class). Pick GPT-6 Sol (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 27B (Medium).
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Max) | Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.6 | 27.6 | −42.0% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 42.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,535.80 | $1,165.00 | −24.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 24.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 94.05s | 56.59s | −39.8% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 39.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) vs GPT-6 Sol (Max): 42.0% less intelligence, 24.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 39.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Sol (Max)Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol/qwen3-8-27b-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol/qwen3-8-27b-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill