GPT-6 Sol (Max) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Max) scores 36.8 points higher (47.6 vs 10.8) but costs 6.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1536 vs $233; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Max) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.6 | 10.8 | −77.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 77.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,535.80 | $232.95 | −84.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 84.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 87.14s | 8.30s | −90.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 90.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-6 Sol (Max): 77.3% less intelligence, 84.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Sol (Max)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill