gpt-oss-120b (Low) vs Mercury 2.5

gpt-oss-120b (Low) vs Mercury 2.5. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIgpt-oss-120b (Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.20
Total cost
-
InceptionMercury 2.5Off the frontier
Intelligence
12.30
Total cost
$218
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Metricgpt-oss-120b (Low)Mercury 2.5Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.212.3+20.6% Mercury 2.5 is 20.6% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$218.11— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.24s4.39s−57.1% Mercury 2.5 is 57.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.13 / $0.59$0.25 / $0.75
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickergpt-oss-120b (Low): what beats itMercury 2.5: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b-low/mercury-2-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b-low/mercury-2-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill