gpt-oss-120b (Low) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)

gpt-oss-120b (Low) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIgpt-oss-120b (Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
-
Total cost
-
MetaMuse Ember (Xhigh)On the frontier
Intelligence
34.10
Total cost
$95.7
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Metricgpt-oss-120b (Low)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)Not reported34.1— not comparable
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$95.73— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.91s9.48s−13.1% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 13.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.13 / $0.59$0.10 / $0.50
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickergpt-oss-120b (Low): what beats itMuse Ember (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b-low/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b-low/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill