gpt-oss-120b (Low) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

gpt-oss-120b (Low) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIgpt-oss-120b (Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.20
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8-Flash-NextOff the frontier
Intelligence
39.80
Total cost
$363
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Metricgpt-oss-120b (Low)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.239.8+290.2% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 3.9× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$362.72— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.13s50.19s+395.5% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 395.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.13 / $0.59$0.15 / $0.47
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickergpt-oss-120b (Low): what beats itQwen3.8-Flash-Next: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b-low/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b-low/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill