gpt-oss-120b (Low) vs Step 3.5 Flash

gpt-oss-120b (Low) vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIgpt-oss-120b (Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.20
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.5 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Metricgpt-oss-120b (Low)Step 3.5 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.216.6+62.7% Step 3.5 Flash is 62.7% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.24s20.68s+102.0% Step 3.5 Flash is 102.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.13 / $0.59$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickergpt-oss-120b (Low): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b-low/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b-low/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill