gpt-oss-120b (High) vs Grok 4.6 (Medium)
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI or Grok 4.6 (Medium) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Medium) scores 31.2 points higher (42.8 vs 11.6) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($1557 vs $123; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Medium) when you need intelligence above 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b (High) when 11.6 is enough.
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Grok 4.6 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.6 | 42.8 | +269.0% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 3.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.71 | $1,557.04 | +1168.9% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.29s | 33.09s | +193.1% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 193.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Medium) vs gpt-oss-120b (High): 269.0% more intelligence, 1168.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 193.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Grok 4.6 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
gpt-oss-120b (High)Grok 4.6 (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/grok-4-6-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/grok-4-6-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill