gpt-oss-120b (High) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 36.5 points higher (48.1 vs 11.6) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $123; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b (High) when 11.6 is enough.
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.6 | 48.1 | +314.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.71 | $2,000.35 | +1530.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 16× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.29s | 63.86s | +465.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 465.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs gpt-oss-120b (High): 314.7% more intelligence, 1530.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 465.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
gpt-oss-120b (High)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill