gpt-oss-120b (High) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 13.6 points higher (25.2 vs 11.6) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $123; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b (High) when 11.6 is enough.
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.6 | 25.2 | +117.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.71 | $427.73 | +248.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 3.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.29s | 45.52s | +303.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 303.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs gpt-oss-120b (High): 117.2% more intelligence, 248.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 303.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
gpt-oss-120b (High)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill