gpt-oss-120b (High) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick gpt-oss-120b (High)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs gpt-oss-120b (High): 20.7% less intelligence, 230.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 46.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.6 | 9.2 | −20.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 20.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.71 | $405.10 | +230.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.61s | 6.22s | −46.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 46.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
gpt-oss-120b (High)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill