gpt-oss-120b (high) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (high) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick gpt-oss-120b (high)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs gpt-oss-120b (high): 11.3% less intelligence, 156.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (high) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.8 | 21.1 | −11.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 11.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $96.28 | $247.26 | +156.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.64s | 6.61s | −37.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 37.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 40.30 for $74.3.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
gpt-oss-120b (high)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill