gpt-oss-120b (high) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (high) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick gpt-oss-120b (high)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs gpt-oss-120b (high): 11.6% less intelligence, 164.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 66.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (high) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 21.3 | −11.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 11.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.61 | $250.18 | +164.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.62s | 5.28s | −66.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 66.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.59 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 51.80 for $72.0.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
gpt-oss-120b (high)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill