gpt-oss-120b (High) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603

gpt-oss-120b (High) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIgpt-oss-120b (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
11.60
Total cost
$123
StepFunStep 3.5 Flash 2603Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Metricgpt-oss-120b (High)Step 3.5 Flash 2603Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)11.617.0+46.6% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 46.6% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$122.71Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.44s20.05s+75.3% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 75.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.15 / $0.60$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickergpt-oss-120b (High): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash 2603: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/step-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/step-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill