gpt-oss-20b (High) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603

gpt-oss-20b (High) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIgpt-oss-20b (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
9.00
Total cost
$28.8
StepFunStep 3.5 Flash 2603Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Metricgpt-oss-20b (High)Step 3.5 Flash 2603Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)9.017.0+88.9% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 88.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$28.81Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)16.79s20.55s+22.4% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 22.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.05 / $0.22$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickergpt-oss-20b (High): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash 2603: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-20b/step-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-20b/step-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill