Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.1

Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.1. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

IBMGranite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
4.90
Total cost
-
MistralMistral Small 3.1Off the frontier
Intelligence
7.10
Total cost
$27.8
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGranite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)Mistral Small 3.1Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)4.97.1+44.9% Mistral Small 3.1 is 44.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$27.82— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)34.60s11.78s−66.0% Mistral Small 3.1 is 66.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.03 / $0.25$0.08 / $0.14
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGranite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning): what beats itMistral Small 3.1: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-3-3-8b-instruct/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-3-3-8b-instruct/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill