Granite 4.2 30B vs Grok 4.3 (High)
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or Grok 4.3 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.3 (High) scores 12.2 points higher (24.9 vs 12.7) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($363 vs $111; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.3 (High) when you need intelligence above 12.7, and Granite 4.2 30B when 12.7 is enough.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | Grok 4.3 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 24.9 | +96.1% Grok 4.3 (High) is 96.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $363.24 | +227.7% Grok 4.3 (High) is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 55.20s | 28.87s | −47.7% Grok 4.3 (High) is 47.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (High) vs Granite 4.2 30B: 96.1% more intelligence, 227.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 47.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Grok 4.3 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Granite 4.2 30BGrok 4.3 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/grok-4-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/grok-4-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill