Granite 4.2 30B vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Glimmer (High) scores 4.8 points higher (17.5 vs 12.7) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($146 vs $111; both mid-range class). Pick Muse Glimmer (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Granite 4.2 30B.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 17.5 | +37.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 37.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $145.77 | +31.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 31.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 55.20s | 24.79s | −55.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 55.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Granite 4.2 30B: 37.8% more intelligence, 31.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Granite 4.2 30BMuse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill