Granite 4.2 30B vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 39.7 points higher (52.4 vs 12.7) but costs 52× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $111; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 12.7, and Granite 4.2 30B when 12.7 is enough.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 52.4 | +312.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $5,786.78 | +5121.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 52× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 55.20s | 43.73s | −20.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 20.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Granite 4.2 30B: 312.6% more intelligence, 5121.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Granite 4.2 30BMuse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill