Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Granite 4.2 30B
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 30B: the same intelligence, 110.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 12.7 | Even |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $233.56 | +110.7% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 65.24s | 22.73s | −65.2% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 65.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Granite 4.2 30BQwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill