Granite 4.2 30B vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603

Granite 4.2 30B vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

IBMGranite 4.2 30BOff the frontier
Intelligence
12.70
Total cost
$111
StepFunStep 3.5 Flash 2603Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGranite 4.2 30BStep 3.5 Flash 2603Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)12.717.0+33.9% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 33.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$110.83Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)51.51s20.25s−60.7% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 60.7% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.16 / $0.65$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGranite 4.2 30B: what beats itStep 3.5 Flash 2603: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/step-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/step-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill