Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 3B by IBM or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Glimmer (High) scores 8.4 points higher (17.5 vs 9.1) but costs 9.8× as much to run the benchmark ($146 vs $14.9; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Glimmer (High) when you need intelligence above 9.1, and Granite 4.2 3B when 9.1 is enough.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 3B | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.1 | 17.5 | +92.3% Muse Glimmer (High) is 92.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.91 | $145.77 | +877.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 9.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.98s | 25.25s | −49.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 49.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.03 / $0.12 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Granite 4.2 3B: 92.3% more intelligence, 877.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Granite 4.2 3BMuse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-3b/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-3b/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill