Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 3B by IBM or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 43.3 points higher (52.4 vs 9.1) but costs 388× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $14.9; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 9.1, and Granite 4.2 3B when 9.1 is enough.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 3B | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.1 | 52.4 | +475.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 5.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.91 | $5,786.78 | +38711.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 388× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.30s | 41.43s | +17.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 17.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.03 / $0.12 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Granite 4.2 3B: 475.8% more intelligence, 38711.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Granite 4.2 3BMuse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-3b/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-3b/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill