Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 8B by IBM or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 35.2 points higher (46.3 vs 11.1) but costs 3.9× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $53.1; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when you need intelligence above 11.1, and Granite 4.2 8B when 11.1 is enough.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 8B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.1 | 46.3 | +317.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 4.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $53.07 | $206.66 | +289.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 3.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.99s | 46.84s | −0.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 0.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.06 / $0.25 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Granite 4.2 8B: 317.1% more intelligence, 289.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 0.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (High) scores 32.90 for $47.9.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Granite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-8b/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-8b/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill