Granite 4.2 8B vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 8B by IBM or Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 8B: 1.8% more intelligence, 19.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 64.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 8B | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.1 | 11.3 | +1.8% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 1.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $53.07 | $42.50 | −19.9% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 19.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.16s | 14.45s | −64.9% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 64.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.06 / $0.25 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (High) scores 32.90 for $47.9.
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Granite 4.2 8BMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-8b/mistral-small-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-8b/mistral-small-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill