Granite 4.2 8B vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 8B by IBM or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Granite 4.2 8B
Solar Pro 3 vs Granite 4.2 8B: 29.7% less intelligence, 200.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 8B | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.1 | 7.8 | −29.7% Solar Pro 3 is 29.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $53.07 | $159.22 | +200.0% Solar Pro 3 is 3.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.25s | 18.94s | −51.7% Solar Pro 3 is 51.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.06 / $0.25 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (High) scores 32.90 for $47.9.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Granite 4.2 8BSolar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-8b/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-8b/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill