Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

SpaceXAIGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.40
Total cost
-
Allen Institute for AIOlmo 3.1 32B ThinkNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Olmo 3.1 32B ThinkDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)20.47.1−65.2% Olmo 3.1 32B Think is 65.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning): what beats itOlmo 3.1 32B Think: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-1-fast-reasoning/olmo-3-1-32b-think · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-1-fast-reasoning/olmo-3-1-32b-think?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill