Grok 4.3 (Low) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Grok 4.3 (Low) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

SpaceXAIGrok 4.3 (Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.30
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8 2.4T A95BOff the frontier
Intelligence
39.90
Total cost
$2632
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGrok 4.3 (Low)Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.339.9+64.2% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 64.2% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,632.05— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)13.96s64.84s+364.5% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 364.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.25 / $2.50$2.00 / $6.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGrok 4.3 (Low): what beats itQwen3.8 2.4T A95B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-low/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-low/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill