Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 24.4 points higher (38.4 vs 14.0) but costs 6.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $250; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 14.0, and Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) when 14.0 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.0 | 38.4 | +174.3% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 2.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.37 | $1,607.86 | +542.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 6.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.93s | 25.45s | +329.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 329.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 174.3% more intelligence, 542.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 329.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill