Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) scores 7.0 points higher (14.0 vs 7.0) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $122; both mid-range class). Pick Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Small 3.2.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.0 | 7.0 | −50.0% Mistral Small 3.2 is 50.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.37 | $121.78 | −51.4% Mistral Small 3.2 is 51.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.89s | 12.50s | +112.2% Mistral Small 3.2 is 112.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 50.0% less intelligence, 51.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 112.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill